Competitive analysis in public procurement: know who you're bidding against

In private markets, you generally know your competitors. You follow their website, meet them at trade fairs, hear through your network what they’re up to. Public procurement is different. The bidding process is closed, communication runs through formal channels, and you often only discover who else submitted — and at what price — after the contract has been awarded.

Yet competitive analysis in public procurement is not only possible, it’s one of the most underused levers for improving your win rate. Knowing who you’re bidding against allows you to position your proposals more precisely.

Why competitive analysis matters in public tenders

The difference between winning and losing a tender is often razor-thin. A construction firm that bids 3% below the next competitor wins. An IT service provider that scores slightly higher on “approach and methodology” takes the contract. But to achieve that edge, you need to understand what the market is doing.

Competitive analysis helps with three concrete decisions:

The bid/no-bid decision. If you know that a particular contracting authority consistently selects the same three suppliers, or that a specific CPV code attracts twelve bidders, you can focus your resources on tenders where your chances are real. Time not wasted on hopeless bids goes into proposals that actually matter.

Pricing strategy. In lowest-price tenders, the gap with competitors is measurable — down to the cent. If opening reports from previous procedures show that your main rival consistently prices 5 to 10% lower, you can account for that in your calculations. Or deliberately target contracts where price pressure is lower.

Qualitative positioning. In best price-quality ratio (BPQR) awards, quality counts. Debriefings and award decisions reveal how the winner scored on approach, references, or sustainability. That information feeds directly into your next proposal.

Where to find competitor information

Public procurement is transparent by design. Several public sources can be consulted systematically.

Opening reports

In open procedures, all bids are opened at a fixed time. The opening report lists the names of all bidders and their total prices. In Belgium, these reports are published on e-Procurement or can be requested from the contracting authority.

This is the most direct source: you see not only who competed, but what they offered. For lowest-price contracts, that’s enough to read the market.

Award decisions and contract award notices

After the award, the contracting authority publishes a contract award notice — on e-Procurement (Belgium), TenderNed (Netherlands), or TED (EU-wide). It contains the winner’s name, the awarded amount, and the number of bids received.

The reasoned award decision goes further. It describes how each bid scored on the award criteria. You’re entitled to request this if you submitted a bid — through the right to a debriefing.

The right to a debriefing

Every unsuccessful bidder has the right to a reasoned explanation. In Belgium, this is established in the Public Procurement Act (Article 9). In the Netherlands, it’s in the Aanbestedingswet 2012. The debriefing tells you:

• How your bid scored on each award criterion
• The characteristics and relative advantages of the winning bid (without disclosing commercially sensitive details)
• The name of the winner

Always request a debriefing, even for contracts you weren’t desperate to win. The information you receive is invaluable for your next submission.

Annual accounts and financial data

For a broader analysis, you can consult competitors’ annual accounts via the National Bank of Belgium (Balance Sheet Centre) or the Chamber of Commerce in the Netherlands. Revenue, gross margin, headcount, and solvency ratios tell you how large a competitor is, how fast they’re growing, and where their limits lie.

A competitor with declining margins may price more aggressively to maintain volume. A growing company with rising headcount may face capacity issues on large contracts. That context helps you understand their strategy.

From data to strategy

Gathering information is step one. The real value lies in translating it into your own approach.

Build a competitor dossier

Track each competitor over time: which contracting authorities do they bid with, which sectors do they serve, what price ranges do they operate in, and how do they score on quality criteria? After ten to twenty contracts, you’ll see patterns. You’ll know who you always encounter, who beats you on price, and who you can outperform on quality.

Identify your niche

You won’t face the same competitors in every tender. An IT company bidding on both infrastructure contracts and consultancy assignments will encounter different players in each segment. Analyse where your win rate is highest, and focus your pipeline there.

Use historical patterns

Many contracting authorities are predictable in their purchasing behaviour. A hospital group that procures a new laboratory information system every three years will probably do so again. A province that concluded a four-year framework agreement for engineering services in 2023 will likely return to the market around 2027. That predictability lets you start preparing before publication.

Watch for market concentration

If the same supplier consistently wins at a particular contracting authority, it may indicate an entrenched relationship or specifications implicitly tailored to that supplier. That’s not a reason to walk away — but it is a reason to look critically at whether the tender documents leave room for alternatives, and whether the investment in a bid is worthwhile.

Transparency and its limits

Public procurement is transparent by design. But there are boundaries. Commercially sensitive information in bids — detailed price breakdowns, technical solution specifics, subcontractor names — is not public. You can request an award decision, but not a competitor’s full submission.

Informally seeking information from contracting authorities about ongoing procedures is equally off-limits. Communication must go through formal channels — the Q&A forum on e-Procurement, the nota van inlichtingen on TenderNed.

What is perfectly acceptable: systematically collecting, combining, and analysing public information. That’s not a grey area — that’s good business.

From manual to systematic

The sources described above are all public. But they’re scattered across multiple platforms, in different formats, and you have to track them yourself. Building a competitor dossier manually takes hours each week — which is why most companies don’t do it, or don’t do it consistently.

TenderWolf brings that information together. The screening feature shows, for each tender, which companies are active with the same contracting authority and in the same market. Company profiles provide financial data, won contracts, and a ranking of how intensely you compete with specific players. Not as a replacement for your own analysis, but as a foundation for working faster and more thoroughly.

---

Further reading

Want to go deeper on related topics? Check these articles in our knowledge base:

• The bid/no-bid decision — a structured framework for deciding whether to submit a bid
• Award criteria: price and quality — how BPQR awards work and how to score well